Should The Reasons For Abortion Be Applied To A Born Child?

By admin | July 29, 2009

Submitted by Stand for Life Blog

Nearly every argument for abortion can be answered in a fairly simple fashion. Whatever the reason for abortion, shouldn’t the same reasoning be used to kill a born child? Should the born baby be killed because it interferes with school or work? Should it be destroyed because the parents just can’t afford it any more? Should a toddler be murdered because it’s not developed like a “normal” child? Of course, the abortion advocate would state that it’s not the same because the baby or toddler is already born. By their own admission the baby in the mother’s womb can be killed just because it is in another location. Although graphic at times, the following videos are a vivid example of this.


Rating 2.00 out of 5
[?]

2 Responses to “Should The Reasons For Abortion Be Applied To A Born Child?”

  1. OperationCounterstrike Says:
    July 30th, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    Ok, please answer THIS argument in a “simple fashion”:

    BEGIN ARGUMENT

    Right-to-lifers have one right answer: fetuses are persons, members of the Human Family, and entitled to all the rights that already-born people enjoy. But right-to-lifers have the wrong QUESTION. What matters is not WHAT the fetus is, but WHERE it is. Location.

    I say if something is inside my body, then I’m entitled to have it killed, NO MATTER WHAT IT IS. Even if it’s an INNOCENT person. If you were inside my body, I’d be entitled to kill you. If I were inside your body, you’d be entitled to kill me. In fact if ALL the people in the WHOLE WORLD, including the innocent ones and the unborn ones, were assembled somewhere inside my body, then I’d be entitled to holocaust them. Or, to just kill SOME of them (right-to-lifers!!) That’s part of the meaning of the word “my” in the phrase “my body”.

    Abortion kills a person. Doing an abortion on a patient against her will is baby-murder. But abortion on demand is JUSTIFIABLE HOMICIDE.

    END ARGUMENT

    Notice that this does NOT justify killing an already-born child, because it is not inside anybody’s body.

    Will there be PAYBACK for the murder of Dr. Tiller? Will there be COUNTERTERROR against right-to-lifers? WHO would be the most effective TARGETS for anti-right-to-lifist counterterror? WHERE do they live?

    AICH TEE TEE PEA://operationcounterstrike.blogspot.com

  2. Scott W. Somerville Says:
    August 13th, 2009 at 11:20 pm

    Operation Counterstrike has copied and pasted this one argument on a number of blogs. Google any piece of it and you’ll see.

Comments