1. If they really are LATE-TERM abortions, eight-hundred bucks is not a very high fee at all. I would expect to pay at least that much for any second-trimester abortion, and a couple of grand for anything past nineteen weeks.

2. It is incorrect to use Planned Parenthood as a standard. PP is, by charter and design, a MINIMAL-COST outfit for people who cannot afford better. Getting an abortion at PP is like buying your wardrobe from Salvation Army. Even other low-end places charge considerably more.

3. After the patently trumped-up charges, and incompetent (at least) mishandling of patients’ medical charts obtained under subpoena, by former Kansas Attorney-General Phill Klown oops Kline, Professor Whipple is quite right to treat anyone remotely connected with right-to-lifism with extreme contempt.

4. You have no business referring to her as “Ms.” Whipple in a health-care related discussion. To you she is PROFESSOR Whipple or DOCTOR Whipple (PhD) or at very least NURSE Whipple.

5. On another not altogether unrelated topic, sooner or later there will be counterterror against right-to-lifers. This totally one-sided terror war in which every significant pro-choice political victory is answered with terrorist attacks, and there are NO counterattacks, is contrary to nature. So many people now are asking why the bullets only seem to fly in one direction, that statistically, one of those asking the question will also be a quiescent homicidal psycho like Jon Salvi (although I shouldn’t call Jon crazy, he made a rational and wise decision to rid the world of his presence by smothering himself in a plastic bag). I’m not talking about driving a car into a building either. I think someone’s gonna execute a carefully planned response-in-kind to the murders of abortion workers. I can tell when people are mad as hell and won’t take it anymore. I predicted Ross Perot would enter the 1992 race before I ever heard of him, when GHerbertWBush was riding his post-Desert-Storm high–I knew there would be a third party to represent the voters who were livid with rage. I knew when Pat Toomey challenged Senator Arlen Specter (R-Pa) that voters were NOT mad enough to kick Specter down. I predicted Paul Hill would run out of enthusiasm for promoting terror in the media (lionizing Michael Griffin) and murder someone himself. I predicted an abortion worker would be murdered within a few months after a pro-choice prez’s victory in 2008, before Obama entered the race (I bet on Hillary, but the point is I predicted the murder, although I didn’t expect it would be Dr. Tiller, who really seemed to be immortal and also was gonna retire soon, age 67, no way he’d ignore signs of deterioration, he’s WAY too responsible. He would have written a definitive textbook, and, one of the most interesting memoirs EVER. I was predicting the victim would be another doc I’d not heard of like Dr. Slepian.)

And now I’m predicting counterterror against right-to-lifers. The question is, when it starts, who will be the first victims? My money is on Professer Robert P. George of Princeton. He’s one of the most respectable right-to-lifers in the world, and he served on George W. Cokehead-Burnout Bush’s “Bioethics” committee. If he were sacrificed, the right-to-life community would understand EXACTLY what the assassination of Dr. Tiller means.

AICH TEE TEE PEA://operationcounterstrike.blogspot.com

PS, if you report me to FBI, make the report SHORT. FBI are very busy and you should waste any more of their time than you absolutely must.

BEGIN ARGUMENT

Right-to-lifers have one right answer: fetuses are persons, members of the Human Family, and entitled to all the rights that already-born people enjoy. But right-to-lifers have the wrong QUESTION. What matters is not WHAT the fetus is, but WHERE it is. Location.

I say if something is inside my body, then I’m entitled to have it killed, NO MATTER WHAT IT IS. Even if it’s an INNOCENT person. If you were inside my body, I’d be entitled to kill you. If I were inside your body, you’d be entitled to kill me. In fact if ALL the people in the WHOLE WORLD, including the innocent ones and the unborn ones, were assembled somewhere inside my body, then I’d be entitled to holocaust them. Or, to just kill SOME of them (right-to-lifers!!) That’s part of the meaning of the word “my” in the phrase “my body”.

Abortion kills a person. Doing an abortion on a patient against her will is baby-murder. But abortion on demand is JUSTIFIABLE HOMICIDE.

END ARGUMENT

Notice that this does NOT justify killing an already-born child, because it is not inside anybody’s body.

Will there be PAYBACK for the murder of Dr. Tiller? Will there be COUNTERTERROR against right-to-lifers? WHO would be the most effective TARGETS for anti-right-to-lifist counterterror? WHERE do they live?

AICH TEE TEE PEA://operationcounterstrike.blogspot.com

What you make when you quote the Declaration of Independence is not an argument about abortion, but a pun on two DIFFERENT meanings of the word “life”.

If something is inside my body then I’m entitled to kill it. Even if it’s a person. Even if it’s an INNOCENT person. If you were inside my body then I’d be entitled to kill YOU! That’s part of the meaning of the word “my” in the phrase “my body”.

It’s just that simple.

When did God tell man, “Do as I say, not as I do”? I missed THAT lesson in Sunday school.